At 3:54 PM +0100 on 12/12/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>It's new syntax which takes some work.
>>I don't see a way around making new syntax harder...
>
>Anthony,
>
> what is new syntax in your case? E.g. if I wanted to add a command:
>
>laugh about <value> when <expression>
>
> would this be new syntax?
Yes.
But "laugh(value,expression)" is not.
> I guess we can make this a lot easier if we have a document that describes
>in detail how to add a new command, what to watch out for etc. A
>walkthrough that describes how to e.g. add the above command would really
>help. If we can't get it any easier without sacrificing a great deal of
>speed, we can't; but if you see a way to make it easier, it'd be greatly
>appreciated.
The docs are as good as we can get. Also, I'd imagine we'd want to
standardize the bytecode.
