>No -- we'll have our own interface, based on the bytecode.
Alain, Anthony,
let me clarify my previous statement: I meant that we'd probably provide
different translations of FreeScript, but I didn't mean we'd use the same
technique and resources for that as HC does. This would be ineffective by
now, especially cross-platform-wise.
>We support plugins, but probably not XCMDs per se. But on the Mac, we could
>support xThings through a plugin :)
I'm sure something like this'll happen. We already have the XCMD code.
>Rather hard to do...
Why? If we want to make it easy for us to add new syntax to FreeScript, we
automatically have to make it easy enough for other programmers to add in
their stuff, too. Of course, it'll require them to be decent programmers...
>I think we've discussed this before, but I'd guess that it'd take quite
>some time to make Perl nice.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html