Re: OODL: Forms of new FreeScript syntax

[DeRobertis]

At 2:00 PM +0100 on 12/16/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>No it won't. The parser couldn't care less about function names. It just
>>sees call the function called so-and-so with parameters so-and-so and put
>>the result into so-and-so.
>
>Anthony,
>
> I meant if we add custom syntax definitions in handler's declaration lines
>like in my example.

Oh. Thanks for the clarification.