Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC

[DeRobertis]

At 10:27 PM +0100 on 12/27/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>True -- but it still beats MFC.
>
> Huh? How'd you get that idea? This sounds to me like: using FrameWorkXY is
>a lot more complicated and slower and doesn't look platform-native on all
>but one platform, but it still beats the Mac toolbox. MFC is practically
>the Windows equivalent of the toolbox (there is a low-level interface, but
>it's sort of like LM-accessors and PBH file manager calls).

Oh. I thaught it was a whole application framework? I'm sayign that using
GTK in a free (speech, not beer) product would be better than MFC, because
the first is  legal for us to distribute, whereas the second I'm sure we
can't distribute.