> >Same goes for the Block-File-Format
> >too.
>
>I thaught XBF was done(?). Uli will have to answer that.
XBF is halfway there. It's already useable but sub-blocks aren't in
there yet. I've found a compromise that should make this easy,
though. If you don't mind I'll use the contents of a block to store
the map of its sub-blocks. This will make it impossible (make that
"harder") to have a block with sub-blocks contain data, but one could
work around this by e.g. using sub-block zero instead. For fixed-size
blocks it'd be easy, but there'll be very few fixed-size blocks, I
guess.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
