>wouldn't that prevent some kinda freecard for applications, like VB for
>applications?
Hi,
then we'd have to LGPL it, instead of using the GPL, but besides that
everything else would stay the same. They'd still be required to ship along
the sources (which I think is only fair).
My main concern is private users needing standalones. Adding it to non-GPL
applications usually means they want to make money off it, and I think we
needn't risk free availability of FreeCard to allow this. How are the
others thinking?
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
- OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
