>> This would only cause problems with people desiring to add closed
>>technologies to the engine, and if they do that and don't want to release
>>an XCMD or send us sources and a lib, they're probably not going to support
>>free software anyhow. I'll throw it into the discussion.
>
>They could still add a plugin/xcmd/whatever-we-call-it. We shouldn't
>have people making the engine proprietary.
Anthony,
I meant just that. They can make an XCMD. If they don't want to do that,
we probably wouldn't want them on the project anyway, to put it in a blunt
way.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
- OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
