Hi, First, a brief message from my SPAM filter, which is apparently not happy with a few things:
> Spam detection software, running on the system "storm.local.network", has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > the administrator of that system for details. [...] > Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 1.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > 0.0 FH_HOST_EQ_VERIZON_P Host is pool-.+verizon.net > 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL > [71.169.171.209 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] > 0.9 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address > [71.169.171.209 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] > 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% > [score: 0.4925] > 0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with > dynamic-looking rDNS My settings are a little on the aggressive side. I will bump the required points up a bit. Still, thought you should know. On to other things... On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Looks like the board is an MSI Fuzzy CX700/CX700D. Right ? Yes: http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9802 > The driver you are using is too old. Please update to latest svn from trunk > and send another xorg log. Okay, I will do that a bit later today. > As your first mail never made it to the list, what is your issue exactly ? On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:20:22PM -0500, Forest Bond wrote: > I'm seeing display artifacts with a 42" Samsung plasma display. I don't see > any issues with a standard LCD or CRT display. It appears to be an > interaction between the VGA BIOS and the driver? > > Attached is a sample X log file (a different display than the Samsung, but > very similar issue), as well as the X configuration. > > My driver version is svn 462. I am not explicitly loading the VBE module, so > I'm a little confused about the magic. > > The display has a native resolution of 1024x720, but I am currently driving it > at 800x600, which it is auto-scaling. I should point out that I've seen the same issue both with the openChrome driver and the vesa driver. I believe this to be an issue with the VGA BIOS. I wasn't sure if the openChrome driver might have some options for coercing the VGA BIOS into doing the right thing. Thanks for any assistance you can provide. -Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
