Using this for all AF spreading with a default K of 1 and using a higher K 
with a certain probability. Seems like a cleaner solution then have 2 
different spreading mechanisms for the AF.


On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 7:27:50 PM UTC+2, Matthew Ikle wrote:
>
> Ahh — I was thinking that the default setting for K would be one but that 
> this would change for specific contexts.
>
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Rather than introduce a new third method, it seems to me that we could 
> simply replace the spreading of importance from everything in the AF with 
> the spreading of importance K links out, where the value of K might be 
> determined from context.
>
>
>
> I just worry that would result in the internal AF STI-spreading
> happening too slowly, thus screwing up attractor-formation dynamics
> inside the AF ...
>
> After all, spreading 3 links out from X may take 100x or 1000x or 10Kx
> more effort than spreading only from X, right?
>
>
>
> The “third method” really just seems to me to be a generalized version of 
> AF spreading rather than a new method. As Roman points out, the actual 
> mechanics of how to spread K links out also needs to be determined.
>
> —matt
>
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> A somewhat interesting point came up in discussions w/ Misgana re ECAN 
> today...
>
> So far we have been working on two methods of attention allocation:
>
> -- spreading importance from everything in the AttentionalFocus, frequently
>
> -- spreading importance from everything in the Atomspace, but more
> slowly (by sampling Atoms from the Atomspace with probability
> proportional to STI, and then spreading from each Atom as it's
> sampled)
>
> But we have seen a need now for a third method
>
> -- iterating through every X in the AttentionalFocus, and spreading
> importance K links out from X (where, say, K=2 or 3)
>
> The practical use-case that made this requirement clear was: rapidly
> boosting the importance of question-answers, that contain words which
> are in the AF....  The question-answers are ImplicationLinks, which
> point to ListLinks, which point to words ... so to get STI to the
> ImplicationLink, a word in the AF needs to send STI to the ListLink
> which then needs to send STI to the ImplicationLink...
>
> But more generally one can view this as an importance-spreading agent
> aimed at spreading activity from the AttentionalFocus to the "Fringe"
> of consciousness -- those things that one can feel at the back of
> one's mind, on the edge of one's consciousness ... one is aware they
> are there but not quite aware of what they are, but one can generally
> with effort pull them into one's awareness...
>
> Sometimes spreading enough STI into the Fringe will cause something in
> the Fringe to get boosted into the AttentionalFocus ....
>
> -- Ben
>
> --
> Ben Goertzel, PhD
> http://goertzel.org
>
> Super-benevolent super-intelligence is the thought the Global Brain is
> currently struggling to form...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdGNipWfnguuZY%2ByyGtnCxAKoXfqoTiYMSsGcqj0rQ5Mw%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/1F463D95-D0D5-4B95-9D4D-092C0EEFDDFC%40gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ben Goertzel, PhD
> http://goertzel.org
>
> Super-benevolent super-intelligence is the thought the Global Brain is
> currently struggling to form...
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBepQVSPMh__wu%2BR2yUjQmCT6ofUr0enxcJttGM0Xbamzg%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/f7c5efcb-48b3-4e22-8553-a11e9f7e8cd7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to