Group:
If you’re not a Springer subscriber, you can find the content of the ‘About
Understanding’ paper here:
http://people.idsia.ch/~steunebrink/Publications/AGI16_understanding.pdf
Happy Reading
/ed
=====================
*Edward T Guy, III, Ph.D.*
[email protected]
On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 6:42:30 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote:
>
> I didn't read this discussion in its entirety, but just wanted to suggest
> nice article
> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-41649-6_11 - in
> which the pragmatic definition of understanding and meaning is given. The
> process understands phenomenon F if this process can 1) explain F; 2)
> predict F; 3) produce plans regarding F; 4) recreate F. The phenomenon F
> has meaning for some process if F is somehow related with the goals which
> process try to achieve. This is good starting point for measuring
> understanding and creating processes that maximizes understanding.
>
> So - my approach
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/opencog/z_Uy5NYwjt4 is to create
> initial process with implemented understanding and learning capabilities
> and let this process to self-improve itself. So - this is step by step
> approach with human invovlement. Not so fancy approach as waiting for the
> full intelligence emerging from the large corpora, but, I guess, still good
> alternative path to AGI.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/0108c0b0-b7db-4147-bf2e-fc045215f31f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
