Hi Linas, 

I guess i should further ask:

What determines the expressiveness of OpenCogs representation, the one that 
is bult-into its inference. 

thank you,

Daniel

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 05:27:45 UTC+3, linas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> how I can differentiate knowledge representation in OpenCog and 
>> traditional knowledge representation techniques.
>>
>
> Opencog is really pretty traditional in its representation form. There are 
> whizzy bits: the ability to assign arbitrary valuations to the KR (e.g. 
> floating point probabilities). Maybe I should say that opencog allows you 
> to "design your own KR", although it provides a reasonable one, based on 
> the PLN books.
>
> There's a pile of tools not available in other KR systems, including a 
> sophisticate pattern matcher, a prototype pattern miner, a learning 
> subsystem, an NLP subsystem.  Its an active project, its open source, with 
> these last two distinguishing it from pretty much everything else.
>
> --linas
>
>
>>
>> On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 12:02:16 AM UTC+5, Nageen Naeem wrote:
>>>
>>> basically, i want to compare knowledge representation techniques, want 
>>> to compare knowledge representation in OpenCog and in clarion? any 
>>> description, please.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 11:54:11 PM UTC+5, linas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OpenCog didn't shift to java from c++?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are welcome to study https://github.com/opencog for the source 
>>>> languages used.
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for defining pros and cons if there is any paper on comparison 
>>>>> with other architecture kindly recommend me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ben has written multiple books on the archtiecture in general.  The 
>>>> wiki describes particular choices.
>>>>
>>>> I am not aware of any other (knowledge-representation) architectures 
>>>> that can do what the atomspace can do.  So I'm not sure what you want to 
>>>> compare against. Triplestore? various actionscripts? Prolog? 
>>>>
>>>> --linas 
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:36:04 PM UTC+5, Ben Goertzel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OpenCog did not shift from Java to C++, it was always C++ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The advantage of Atomspace is that it allows fine-grained semantic 
>>>>>> representations of all forms of knowledge in a common framework.  The 
>>>>>> disadvantage is, this makes things complicated.   The other advantage 
>>>>>> is, this fine-grained representation makes data amenable to multiple 
>>>>>> AI algorithms, including ones that can work together synergetically 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ben 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>> > Hey, 
>>>>>> > I'm searching for pros and cons for using atomspace for knowledge 
>>>>>> > representation but didn't get any full-fledged answer related to 
>>>>>> it. what 
>>>>>> > are the pros and cons of using atomspace and why OpenCog shifted to 
>>>>>> java 
>>>>>> > from c++ what are reasons behind it? 
>>>>>> > 
>>>>>> > -- 
>>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups 
>>>>>> > "opencog" group. 
>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an 
>>>>>> > email to [email protected]. 
>>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>>>>>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. 
>>>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> > 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/bd2cd2ad-b15c-4a2e-a962-328a3197c0d7%40googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Ben Goertzel, PhD 
>>>>>> http://goertzel.org 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I am God! I am nothing, I'm play, I am freedom, I am life. I am the 
>>>>>> boundary, I am the peak." -- Alexander Scriabin 
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "opencog" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/d6da6287-a623-47eb-b3c3-6444bce465c0%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/d6da6287-a623-47eb-b3c3-6444bce465c0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9027f916-6faa-4f85-8dbd-4149fa94bf32%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to