Thanks, Linas.
Now my question what is knowledge how can you explain knowledge in 
cognitive agent? what is  knowledge basically a data structure, an 
information or what?

On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 9:11:06 PM UTC+5, linas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Can we say that knowledge representation in OpenCog is somehow equal to 
>> human level knowledge representation? if you can say then give reasons, 
>> please.
>>
>
> I'm very sorry, but that question does not make sense.  Knowledge 
> representation in humans is done floating in a chemical soup of hormones in 
> the blood-stream, neurotransmitters in junctions, highspeed electrical 
> signals that "teleport" (think "stargate") neurotransmitters across long 
> distances at high speeds (we call these teleportation devices "neurons" - 
> up to two meters long) 
>
> This two-meter length can be overcome by using printed books, television 
> media, social media, and e-mails. Basically, my neurons talk to your 
> neurons through email.  Email is a weird idea-teleportation device.  Our 
> two brains are part of a much bigger brain.
>
> Currently, the largest such "global brains" are capitalist corporations 
> and nations.  Think of a corporation, or a nation, as a super-sophisticated 
> "meme".  Like a cat meme, but much much more complex.  
>
> Although corporations are enabled by humans, they run automatically.  Some 
> machines are created by accident; for example, World War One was a 
> knowledge representation system that happened "by accident", and it only 
> stopped when it ran out of feed-stock (young men to kill).
>
> AGI is the gradual migration of various portions of corporations onto 
> silicon computers.
>
> Going in the other direction, Roger Penrose and Sturart Hammeroff think 
> that individual living biological cells are quantum computers. Maybe they 
> are right.
>
> Although opencog can be used to represent a quantum computer, it would be 
> silly to use this representation, and then try to create a full-automated, 
> no-humans-involved, capitalist corporation.  In principle, opencog can do 
> this,  In practice, not so much.
>
> --linas
>  
>
>> Thanks
>> Regards 
>> Nageen
>>
>>
>> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 11:34:54 AM UTC+5, Nageen Naeem wrote:
>>>
>>> is opencog knowledge representation language is able to learn things? 
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 9:47:45 AM UTC+5, Daniel Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Linas, 
>>>>
>>>> I guess i should further ask:
>>>>
>>>> What determines the expressiveness of OpenCogs representation, the one 
>>>> that is bult-into its inference. 
>>>>
>>>> thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 27 April 2017 05:27:45 UTC+3, linas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> how I can differentiate knowledge representation in OpenCog and 
>>>>>> traditional knowledge representation techniques.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Opencog is really pretty traditional in its representation form. There 
>>>>> are whizzy bits: the ability to assign arbitrary valuations to the KR 
>>>>> (e.g. 
>>>>> floating point probabilities). Maybe I should say that opencog allows you 
>>>>> to "design your own KR", although it provides a reasonable one, based on 
>>>>> the PLN books.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a pile of tools not available in other KR systems, including a 
>>>>> sophisticate pattern matcher, a prototype pattern miner, a learning 
>>>>> subsystem, an NLP subsystem.  Its an active project, its open source, 
>>>>> with 
>>>>> these last two distinguishing it from pretty much everything else.
>>>>>
>>>>> --linas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 12:02:16 AM UTC+5, Nageen Naeem wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> basically, i want to compare knowledge representation techniques, 
>>>>>>> want to compare knowledge representation in OpenCog and in clarion? any 
>>>>>>> description, please.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 11:54:11 PM UTC+5, linas wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OpenCog didn't shift to java from c++?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are welcome to study https://github.com/opencog for the source 
>>>>>>>> languages used.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for defining pros and cons if there is any paper on 
>>>>>>>>> comparison with other architecture kindly recommend me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ben has written multiple books on the archtiecture in general.  The 
>>>>>>>> wiki describes particular choices.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not aware of any other (knowledge-representation) 
>>>>>>>> architectures that can do what the atomspace can do.  So I'm not sure 
>>>>>>>> what 
>>>>>>>> you want to compare against. Triplestore? various actionscripts? 
>>>>>>>> Prolog? 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --linas 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:36:04 PM UTC+5, Ben Goertzel 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OpenCog did not shift from Java to C++, it was always C++ 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The advantage of Atomspace is that it allows fine-grained 
>>>>>>>>>> semantic 
>>>>>>>>>> representations of all forms of knowledge in a common framework.  
>>>>>>>>>> The 
>>>>>>>>>> disadvantage is, this makes things complicated.   The other 
>>>>>>>>>> advantage 
>>>>>>>>>> is, this fine-grained representation makes data amenable to 
>>>>>>>>>> multiple 
>>>>>>>>>> AI algorithms, including ones that can work together 
>>>>>>>>>> synergetically 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ben 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Nageen Naeem <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>> > Hey, 
>>>>>>>>>> > I'm searching for pros and cons for using atomspace for 
>>>>>>>>>> knowledge 
>>>>>>>>>> > representation but didn't get any full-fledged answer related 
>>>>>>>>>> to it. what 
>>>>>>>>>> > are the pros and cons of using atomspace and why OpenCog 
>>>>>>>>>> shifted to java 
>>>>>>>>>> > from c++ what are reasons behind it? 
>>>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>>>> > -- 
>>>>>>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups 
>>>>>>>>>> > "opencog" group. 
>>>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>> it, send an 
>>>>>>>>>> > email to [email protected]. 
>>>>>>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>>>>>>>>>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. 
>>>>>>>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/bd2cd2ad-b15c-4a2e-a962-328a3197c0d7%40googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Ben Goertzel, PhD 
>>>>>>>>>> http://goertzel.org 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "I am God! I am nothing, I'm play, I am freedom, I am life. I am 
>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>> boundary, I am the peak." -- Alexander Scriabin 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "opencog" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/d6da6287-a623-47eb-b3c3-6444bce465c0%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/d6da6287-a623-47eb-b3c3-6444bce465c0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/7a3d8cc0-0200-4d73-acb5-f96d8a79f094%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to