Having code "for" all those things doesn't mean much really does it .. it's easy to create a bunch of OO classes with fancy cognitive-sounding names, and then stick some hand-coded rules or supervised-trained ML models in objects instantiating each of the classes... this may give you a way to architect software programs that are cognitive-ish in information flow and that do stuff, but it won't give you a thinking machine, not by a long shot...
ben On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Ed Pell <[email protected]> wrote: > Holy Cow! They have released this architecture diagram. > > https://github.com/watson-intu/self-docs/blob/develop/Logical%20View%20(Key%20Classes).jpg > > I wonder how much of that has code. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "opencog" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/d2ad8367-fbc0-438d-8c96-efd4addc3f38%40googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "I am God! I am nothing, I'm play, I am freedom, I am life. I am the boundary, I am the peak." -- Alexander Scriabin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdmRHYYRohFWJ%2BTqh-Q0KJYdbctsy36czMYuM%3DznsAQEQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
