On 05/22/2018 08:34 AM, Nil Geisweiller wrote:
Do you mean that this link is needed for Pattern Matcher to explicitly
know that we want to apply TimesLink, etc. to Values? I guess, it
makes sense, although this might be not too efficient, indeed.
The atomization might be the problem, but if it is meant to be
volatile (not be stored in the atomspace) then maybe the whole thing
can be done efficiently.
Actually, I don't think the atomese interpretor (the Instantiator class)
insert intermediary created atoms in the atomspace, so it might actually
be almost efficient out-of-the-box.
Nil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/fd095224-e647-45d6-e65d-27318abf3678%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
