On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Nil Geisweiller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 08:34 AM, Nil Geisweiller wrote: > >> Do you mean that this link is needed for Pattern Matcher to explicitly >>> know that we want to apply TimesLink, etc. to Values? I guess, it makes >>> sense, although this might be not too efficient, indeed. >>> >> >> The atomization might be the problem, but if it is meant to be >> volatile (not be stored in the atomspace) then maybe the whole thing >> can be done efficiently. >> > > Actually, I don't think the atomese interpretor (the Instantiator class) > insert intermediary created atoms in the atomspace, so it might actually be > almost efficient out-of-the-box. Yes, I worked very hard to try to make the Instantiator not insert anything into the atomspace until the very last possible moment. I was mostly successful. There are some hard parts. But at some point, the Instantiator has to return to the caller, and then what? The caller gets this mess, what does the caller want to do with it? You can't pass the buck forever. -- cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA35pw%2BYmZAROAsr%2Bu1JE-RW1HE9uwwMZO19QmJ0ocpykQg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
