> 1. Does it work? > 2. Would it work well for representing scene graphs for use in scene-based > reasoning?
Not without significant tweaks I suppose. In principle grammars can describe scenes (see e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04368 for some theoretical stabs), but I think the code you refer to is currently somewhat adapted to the case of grammars for sequences of symbols not 2D or 3D scenes > 3. Are there Python bindings? > 4. Do they work? > > That's all. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "opencog" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/b5e27b12-120f-47ec-8084-ab141f3a1a2e%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "Listen: This world is the lunatic's sphere, / Don't always agree it's real. / Even with my feet upon it / And the postman knowing my door / My address is somewhere else." -- Hafiz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBe_Y5Cda%2B10FXtgCDeMP5OV7Q%2BCZ-W8L%2Bm-oJh40hKVFw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
