Hi Ben, a great pleasure to meet you! Il giorno mercoledì 28 aprile 2021 alle 21:42:02 UTC+2 Ben Goertzel ha scritto:
> I was referring to Michele's student project which is clearly not > aimed at scalable production code... whether Michele uses Hyperon or > Original OpenCog, it's a student research experiment on > BlocksWorld.... > you are right, my project is absolutely not aimed at a development of scalable production code (it would be nice but I would not graduate anymore). Broadly speaking, the idea is to bring a simple example of the potential of an architecture towards AGI in an "industrial" environment. Now, what potential can it ever have? My supervisors say that if I solved this simple plan, I could add communication with a human and thus get a planner that is certainly inefficient, restricted to the domain of blocks, etc. But a planner based on the semantic aspect of the problem, compared to all those solvers who solve problems without understanding their meaning. Simple example: let's say that the red cube is a book and the green cube is a glass. The robot knows this (for now I'm using apriltag above the cubes, but with pointcloud and some good classifiers I think we can recognize objects without labeling them, or better yet with NN on the images). Anyway, the robot's actions are pick-up and put-down of cubes. The idea is to tell the robot "Drink" or "Read" and see it take the glass rather than the book. Finally it would be nice that, if the plan fails (there isn't a book on table), the robot interacts with the human to increase its knowledge base and fill in the gaps that led to the plan to fail. I'm not sure if this all makes sense, I'm still learning and understanding this wide world. Maybe you will be able to comment on this idea. > Hyperon is ultimately intended as an alternative to current OpenCog > Atomspace, yes. However the current crude Hyperon prototype code is > definitely NOT intended as an alternative to Atomspace -- yet can > still be used for research experimentation. > > > (1) ASP will solve most planning and constraint satisfaction problems in > milliseconds. So you can do a 60-frames-per-second update rate if you wish. > > Ah cool, good to know!!! My intuition on this is obsolete, > apparently ;p ... will look up some references... So ultimately, could it make more sense for me to work with the current OpenCog or approach Hyperon? Thank you all for your interest. Michele -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/eb3f85de-53b1-48f4-a802-338949316938n%40googlegroups.com.
