It's realistic to do this using Original OpenCog, and a fairly
interesting challenge.  Whether the current Hyperon prototype is
suitable for this sort of experimentation right now is not clear to me
, Alexey or Vitaly could tell you...

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:16 AM Michele Thiella <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben, a great pleasure to meet you!
>
> Il giorno mercoledì 28 aprile 2021 alle 21:42:02 UTC+2 Ben Goertzel ha 
> scritto:
>>
>> I was referring to Michele's student project which is clearly not
>> aimed at scalable production code... whether Michele uses Hyperon or
>> Original OpenCog, it's a student research experiment on
>> BlocksWorld....
>
>
> you are right, my project is absolutely not aimed at a development of 
> scalable production code (it would be nice but I would not graduate anymore).
> Broadly speaking, the idea is to bring a simple example of the potential of 
> an architecture towards AGI in an "industrial" environment.
> Now, what potential can it ever have?
>
> My supervisors say that if I solved this simple plan, I could add 
> communication with a human and
> thus get a planner that is certainly inefficient, restricted to the domain of 
> blocks, etc.
> But a planner based on the semantic aspect of the problem, compared to all 
> those solvers who solve problems without understanding their meaning.
>
> Simple example:
>
> let's say that the red cube is a book and the green cube is a glass.
> The robot knows this (for now I'm using apriltag above the cubes, but with 
> pointcloud and some good classifiers I think we can recognize objects without 
> labeling them, or better yet with NN on the images).
> Anyway, the robot's actions are pick-up and put-down of cubes.
> The idea is to tell the robot "Drink" or "Read" and see it take the glass 
> rather than the book.
> Finally it would be nice that, if the plan fails (there isn't a book on 
> table), the robot interacts with the human to increase its knowledge base and 
> fill in the gaps that led to the plan to fail.
>
> I'm not sure if this all makes sense, I'm still learning and understanding 
> this wide world.
> Maybe you will be able to comment on this idea.
>
>
>>
>> Hyperon is ultimately intended as an alternative to current OpenCog
>> Atomspace, yes. However the current crude Hyperon prototype code is
>> definitely NOT intended as an alternative to Atomspace -- yet can
>> still be used for research experimentation.
>>
>> > (1) ASP will solve most planning and constraint satisfaction problems in 
>> > milliseconds. So you can do a 60-frames-per-second update rate if you wish.
>>
>> Ah cool, good to know!!! My intuition on this is obsolete,
>> apparently ;p ... will look up some references...
>
>
> So ultimately, could it make more sense for me to work with the current 
> OpenCog or approach Hyperon?
>
> Thank you all for your interest.
>
> Michele
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/eb3f85de-53b1-48f4-a802-338949316938n%40googlegroups.com.



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“He not busy being born is busy dying" -- Bob Dylan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdGQNB-HgTftdok%2B1%3DB7j49Wo%3Dr2Ax8zDcNLU_52vHAbA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to