Okay, now that the easy stuff is out of the way, I guess I roll up my sleeves
and dig in :) Does anyone else see this strange behaviour with the
interactors?? Especially on a different platform. Or better yet, does anyone
see the correct behavior with a similar setup?? I'm referring mainly to the
interactor problems. I can see the geometry problems, and the core dumps, I
just haven't located the code that is causing it yet.

On 06-Dec-99 at 17:52, David L. Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've compiled all of said things myself with gcc 2.95.2. I have 
> libc6, then compiled XFree86 3.3.5, and then LessTif, plus all the 
> gnome and enlightment stuff.
> 
> David
> 
> >Understood. Pretty much the same reason I got into LessTif. I don't know
> >much about LinuxPPC. Do you have any idea how X, libc, and LessTif were
> >compiled? The interactor problems sound like some of the strange reports
> >we've  had when X
> >was compiled with libc5, LessTif with libc6, or X was compiled with gcc
> >2.7.2 and LessTif with egcs, and many other different combinations. I'm
> >not sure of the exact details, but it seems that mixing and matching
> >compilers/libs is not a good idea. Best if all of the components get
> >compiled with the same tools. It's not always easy to tell, but if the
> >LinuxPPC dist. comes with X, and you haven't upgraded the compilers and you
> >compiled LessTif on this machine, everything is probably matched fairly
> >well. 
> >I reproduced a couple of the "dumps", so I will start with those.....
> 
> .............................................................................
> David L. Thompson                          The University of Montana
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 Computer Science Department
> http://www.cs.umt.edu/u/dthompsn           Missoula, MT  59812
>                                             Work Phone : (406)257-8530

Reply via email to