We've put the tarballs on ww.research.ibm.com/dx in the download directory.
Looks like we need to update the download page.
There's something still funky about building building w/out javadx I have
valid javac and jar, so it goes ahead and tries to build javadx, but I
don't have some netscape stuff, and so it fails. I thought (now knowing
much about javadx) that the netscape and cosmo interfaces were optional.
If so, the build ought to work without them; if so, then not having them
ought to reclude trying to build javadx at all. Anybody out there
understand this stuff? Looks like Rick Scott made changes so that you can
roll a tarball w/out building javadx, so my tarballs ought to be OK, but
I'd appreciate somebody who uses javadx testing this
I'll bump the version numbers today.
Greg
David Thompson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [opendx-dev] How it
goes.
son.ibm.com
05/21/02 12:46 PM
Please respond to
opendx-dev
I've now built and packaged binaries up on four systems. I don't see
any problems. So what I suggest happens next:
Release 4.2.0 tarballs -- Greg do you want to do this or should I just do
it?
I can make announcements to freshmeat, etc. and update OpenDX.org
with pertinent info.
Bump cvs release numbers to 4.2.1 (for development to take place).
Randall has stuff to start adding already. Again, do you want me to
do it?
David
--
.............................................................................
David L. Thompson Visualization and Imagery Solutions,
Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5515 Skyway Drive, Missoula, MT 59804
Phone : (406)257-8530
