That's why I wanted it in Compute. Otherwise, you have to use a loop
to try and do this and it gets really messy, whereas adding the
function to Compute would seem to fit nicely.
David Thompson:
|>3) I would like to add isnan and finite (and maybe more) to the "Compute"
|> module. Is there any good reasons against?
|
|Hey why you're in there, could you add strcat?
You can do it with Format( "%s%s", "str1", "str2" ).
However I don't think Format loops over its inputs like Compute, which
prevents you from doing this on arrays. One of the guys here in the lab
was wishing for that recently.
|That's the only one that isn't in Compute that I'm always looking for. Of
|course sprintf would be a nice one too.
Sounds like Format. Should we modify Format to loop over its inputs?
Randy
--
Randall Hopper (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lockheed Martin Operation Support
EPA Scientific Visualization Center
US EPA N127-01; RTP, NC 27711
--
.............................................................................
David L. Thompson Visualization and Imagery Solutions, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5515 Skyway Drive, Missoula, MT 59804
Phone : (406)257-8530
