Thanks Greg, this is excellent. I should have thought of this myself,
but I only learned about `Include' yesterday, after posting the question,
so I think I'm excused.
I'd like to say something in public, for the record:
I'm fully, madly, deeply in love with this program.
I think I'm a reasonably experienced scientific programmer (plenty
of ANSI C, PLENTY of Fortran (yuck), some C++, Matlab, etc., some
really esoteric stuff -- plenty of OCCAM, if anyone even knows/remembers
this, a lot of experience with parallelization of scientific codes)
and I'd like to contribute to the development and maintainance of OpenDX.
I'd like to know if there is a core set of developers, someone who can point
out the more pressing things to be done. I know I can download the CVS (I'm
running it, as a matter of fact, for me it's much more stable than the stable
release) and start hacking away, but it would be more productive, I think, to
do this within some global vision.
I'm totally pressed for time until the end of this year, but from January
onwards I'll _make_ time to work with OpenDX.
Thanks again,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:20:04AM -0500, Gregory D Abram wrote:
>
> Sure. Mark data, Compute("mag(a)" ... Include(min=0.0 max=0.0 exclude=1,
> cull=0), Unmark(data). That'll tag each null vector as invalid, and
> Autoglyph won't add a glyph for them.
>
> Greg
--
Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key: http://www.demec.ufpe.br/~rbw/GPG/gpg_key.txt
