Hi David,

The boundary conditions are described for each direction separately. For
example, there may be an i-surfice at i=64, j=1 to 12 and k=23 to 74,
with normal = -1 and boundary conditions type 7:

i-surfaces  imin imax jmin jmax kmin kmax normal bc_type 
   ....
     7       64   64    1   12   23   74    -1      7
     8        1    1    1   49    1  128     1      2     
   ....

where i-surfaces is just a sequential bc_surface tag. I would like to be
able to tag the surface points with both i-surface and with bc_type
property tags. The reason I need this is that I have 1/8 of the grid for
an axial-symetric problem. Now I need to restore the full grid along
with the boundary conditions. Because I am at the beginning of the work
I am trying to foresee some usual problems with generation of a grid and
to build a tool that will make debugging of this process easier. 

Thanks,
Ted   
  

David Thompson wrote:
> 
> One of the problems that you might face with the general file format
> is that it brings in all of the data as separate fields. Can you
> explain a little further how the boundary of the grid is tagged? I
> don't clearly see where any of these properties would be.
> 
> David
> 
> >Hi David,
> >
> >I wrote a fortran code to generate the data so I am pretty flexible.
> >Currently I use general data format:
> >
> >  file         = c_q3.data
> >  grid         =          141 x           48 x           25
> >  format       = text
> >  interleaving = field
> >  majority     = column
> >  header       = lines 6
> >  field =    P,        T,        M,        H,        invalid,  locations
> >  structure= scalar,   scalar,   scalar,   scalar,   scalar,   3-vector
> >  type =     float,    float,    float,    float,    int,      float
> >  dependency=positions,positions,positions,positions,positions,positions
> >  end
> >
> >How can I apply different attributes to the points that belong to the
> >boundaries with different boundary conditions imposed? I suspect I
> >should use data explorer native format and enter each boundary as a
> >separate object but it seems too complicated to me and I am afraid I am
> >missing something that may make the life easier.
> >
> >I will really appreciate your comments.
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >Ted
> >
> >
> --
> .............................................................................
> David L. Thompson                          The University of Montana
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 Computer Science Department
> http://www.cs.umt.edu/u/dthompsn           Missoula, MT  59812
>                                             Work Phone : (406)257-8530

-- 
Ted Sariyski

Combustion Research and Flow Technology, Inc.
174 North Main Street
Building 3, P.O.Box 1150
Dublin, PA 18917
Tel: (215) 249-9780
Fax: (215) 249-9796
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to