Route-Render-Writeimage is likely preferred, but it *is* possible to turn off 
the

display part of Image, run the net in script mode and write a file instead, just
by telling Image it is
running in the JavaDX environment.  See

http://opendx.watson.ibm.com/dx/mailArchives/mails.html/opendx-users.0005/msg00079.html

Pete

Wolfgang Braun wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a bug report and a question. First the bug report: When I create a net
> using the visual program editor and I set the recordEnable flag of Image, it
> seems not to get saved when I save the net. After reloading, the recordEnable
> is again set to 0. After changing it manually in the .net-file using a text
> editor, the visual program editor loads the net with the flag enabled in the
> configuration list of Image. Is this an intended behavior?
>
> Now here's my problem: I am running numerous numerical simulations using a
> modular bash script. The simulation machine (linux) runs without a screen
> over the network. I log on to it (via ssh), start the simulation and log out.
> The bash script then runs the simulation, processes the results and composes
> everything including bitmap and vector graphs of the output into a section of
> LaTeX code that gets appended to an electronic log. After TeXing this log, I
> get an automatically created book that archives the simulations and their
> results. Now I have created a net that reads in the simulation data, displays
> them using Image and writes a tiff-file as output using recordEnable of
> Image. I can run also run this using something like `dx -script
> dataprocess.net' from the bash script. I have found no way so far, however,
> to turn off the screen display of Image. If I log out befor the script
> terminates, it cannot find an x-server and terminates. There seems to be no
> way to do something like `dx -script dataprocess.net -display /dev/null'.
> Also, the Image module does not seem to have an option to turn off the screen
> display (which I can kind of understand, since that's what it was designed
> for). For my application, it would be very nice if I had an easy and simple
> way to use (almost) the same .net for both the interactive and quiet batch
> processing of my data. This would allow me to e.g. interactively set new
> camera values and then start another batch of several simulations, let's say
> over the weekend.
> What can I do? Am I missing something obvious?
> Thanks in advance,
> Wolfgang
> --
> Dr. Wolfgang Braun
> Paul-Drude Institute
> for Solid State Electronics
> Hausvogteiplatz 5-7
> D-10117 Berlin
>
> office: +49-(0)30-20377-366
> bessy: +49-(0)30-6392-4879
> mobile: +49-(0)170-2635-118
> fax  : +49-(0)30-20377-201

Reply via email to