I can't speak for Win32, but Unix certainly apportions available memory
so as to not allow one single application to hog too much. I had to
write a script in Perl to convince the OS that it allow more.
Just a guess...but maybe something similar goes in Win32? Anybody
know for certain???
Gan
Bernd Jäger wrote:
There is 1GB memory available, so I can't see why OpenDX just uses
324 MB
Bernd.
On Tue,
12 Oct 2004, David Thompson wrote:
You probably need to add more physical memory to your machine.
David
Hi!
Unfortunately this doesn't help.
The first Line in the message Windows show allway:
Memory cache will use 324 MB (20 for small items, 304 for large)
independent of the -memory option I give.
Any more ideas?
Thanks in advance, Bernd.
--
.............................................................................
David L. Thompson Visualization and Imagery Solutions, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5515 Skyway Drive, Missoula, MT 59804
Phone : (406)756-7472
--
Bernd Jaeger, Institut fuer Physikalische Chemie, Universitaet Wien,
Waehringer Strasse 42, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Tel.: +43-1-4277-52417, FAX: +43-1-4277-9524
------------------- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------
--
Mistera Sturno - Rarest Extinct Bird
<(+)__ Gan Uesli Starling
((__/)=- Kalamazoo, MI, USA
`||`
++ http://starling.us
