On 25-06-18 14:56, Anastasiou A. wrote:
Once you have this minimal dataset discovered, THEN you could compose the
template or automatically create the archetypes.
And yes, this CAN be done today, definitely.
There is an understandable mindset which aspires to work with a
standard-set of archetypes, which are many times reviewed, and which
have a review-status and a kind of guaranteed quality. There is a risque
of bias in this, for example: That datapoint is not practical, a GP will
never record that, or it is not significant. Those predefined archetypes
are always a filter on what can occur. But they have also an advantage
because they are build on common sense, on what is desirable in
healthcare to know. So mostly they cover what is to say about a disease,
but it is always knowledge from the past, and always in common sense, so
it is quite conservative.
I wonder if besides that approach an approach of archetypes growing in
the wild could be of use. They could be used beside the predefined
archetypes.
So we don't need to worry, we throw nothing away. We are adding, not
replacing.
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
