Tim Benson wrote: >If standards (including standards for reusable elements) are properly >anchored in specific use cases, then we can rid ourselves of a great deal of >the bloated optionality which is the curse of so many otherwise good >standards. > I agree, but they also need to be anchored in considerations from experience (analysis patterns if you like) and good design principles (which do not change the requirements, but may nevertheless change the way a standard is expressed).
- thomas beale - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
