On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 07:01, Thomas Beale wrote: > > > right. This is exactly the openEHR approach. Have a look at the > reference models, including for demographics > (http://www.openehr.org/Doc_html/Model/Reference/demographic.htm), and > you will see that is exactly what the approach is. Actually, the > demographics model is intended to work for all care domains. Undoubtedly > it has to be improved before it does that, but that's what > implementation and testing are for...
Why are parties versioned? Human cloning is banned in most countries, and so far unsuccessful in the rest. Maybe for a Raelian EHR? Seriously, the attributes of a party change, but the identity of the party remains the same? Or is versioning just an easy way of incorporating the time domain into the model? If so, it is easy, but inefficient. Tim C > > - thomas > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org -- Tim C PGP/GnuPG Key 1024D/EAF993D0 available from keyservers everywhere or at http://members.optushome.com.au/tchur/pubkey.asc Key fingerprint = 8C22 BF76 33BA B3B5 1D5B EB37 7891 46A9 EAF9 93D0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20030805/05705dc2/attachment.asc>
