Christopher Feahr wrote:
>Thomas, >Thanks for the comments. My only caution about asking physicians to >comment on the desirability of EHR-system proposals is that they may not >understand [what we mean by] our questions... and we probably won't >really understand [what they mean by] their responses. > >When we ask for input from practicing physicians, I would rather pose >very discrete questions, such as: "When you do this procedure, our >committee believes that these information components are absolutely >necessary... do you agree?" > >Anyway... this has been a busy few days with all the activity in the HL7 >EHR SIG, and I guess I was in a particularly verbose mode... even for >me... yesterday! (I saw several "please remove me! messages posted >today... I hope I didn't drive away any of your "regulars customers"!) > don't worry about it - these are interesting topics. The only alternative is to have numerous lists, and we tried that on GEHR, and it exists on HL7, and all you get is massive cross-posting all the time. - thomas beale - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
