Tim Cook wrote: > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 18:29, Tim Churches wrote: > > >>At a glance, there would not appear to be much in the way of novelty in >>the claims, and several groups here in Australia plan to lodge >>objections to the application. Others may wish to object to the >>applications in their own countries. If anyone can suggest clear prior >>art which was published before April 2002, and ideally before April >>2001, then please let me know (or post details to this list so the prior >>art can be shared around). > > > Thanks for the heads up Tim. > It likely will come down to who has the time/money to properly fight this. > What is the name of the organization that caused the review for MS's patent > application on the FAT filesystem?
The Public Patent Foundation - see http://www.pubpat.org - they may be interested in taking it on, before the patent issues in the US. Thanks, Tim C -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 254 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20041124/d795b6b6/attachment.asc>
