Kerry Raymond wrote:
> There are undeniably enormous challenges in this area.
> 
> However, right now, we have a health system that operates off bits of 
> paper augmented with IT here and there. Can we verify the authenticity 
> of a medical record from the 1970s today? Will a paper health record 
> created today be authenticated in 2030? If a doctor receives a medical 
> history on paper and one of the pages has a fold on the corner which 
> causes two pages to be turned instead of one, can we prove in a court 
> today if the doctor did or didn't see the information on the second 
> page? Hey, forensic science isn't that good even on CSI :-)
> 
> Surely the goal of EHR is to do better than the existing systems in some 
> areas (so there is benefit in choosing EHR), and no worse in others (so 
> there is no significant detriment)? For example, won't some patients 
> have better outcomes because their doctors have access to their past 
> allergic reactions thanks to an EHR, even if we cannot prove in a court 
> whether the information did or didn't get rendered correctly on a 
> computer screen?
> 
> If we are serious about proving in court "what the doctor saw", I can 
> only suggest that we create a head-mounted device with a camera 
> (positioned at eye level) and  microphones positioned at ears and mouth 
> and record every second of the doctor's working life as evidence of what 
> they saw, heard and said. 

The point here is not a big-brother forensic approach
- but rather one in which the medic cannot deny that they had the 
opportunity to consult the entire record document
[electronic or paper] that arrived on their [virtual or real]
desktop - in the state of completeness that it happened to arrive.

In that case the medic can carry our their traditional *responsibility*
extracting all the relevant details available in that record document
- unmonitored. [Of course they might like to call a colleague to check
the facts - as they traditionally have done and surely will want to go
on doing]

The system designer's *responsibiity* is to not make that
opportunity more difficult in the case of an electronic document than it
is in the case of a paper record.


\Gavin

-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

Reply via email to