Bert Verhees wrote: > > Thanks, even it is not the same as CEN, it helps me understand CEN > better. Too bad that we have to deal with three standards. For a > technician like me this is terrible, too bad it is hard to get to > different views based on different technical experience.
we wish there were not 3 specifications as well. But there are many reasons why we cannot use the HL7 data types. We are also dedicated to requirements basis and implementability for openEHR, and the models you see here I think are by now pretty reasonable attempts on both counts - they are now implemented in various languages, and the requirements are (mostly) clearly indicated. A new version of the openEHR data types specification will be out very soon, fixing some of the details of the UML and so on. - thomas - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
