Hi, Just a doubt.
Why the classes names are not included in the XML-Schema?. For instance, it would convenient for multi-valued attributes in order to distinguish one data instance from another (imagine the potential mess if the attribute is not ordered). It will also make it "more compatible" with paths of the form class\attribute\class\attribute of archetypes. Beside, much typing information is lost, this makes the XML document less self-descriptive. regards Sam Heard escribi: > Dear All > > The Schema on the Ocean site are now in four sections and use > inheritence of LOCATABLE across the schema. > > * http://oceaninformatics.biz/schema/documentation/Composition.xsd.html > * http://oceaninformatics.biz/schema/documentation/Content.xsd.html > * http://oceaninformatics.biz/schema/documentation/Structure.xsd.html > * http://oceaninformatics.biz/schema/documentation/BaseTypes.xsd.html > > This addresses some of the comments I have received. > > Sam > > -- > > > Dr. Sam Heard > MBBS, FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI > > CEO and Clinical Director > Ocean Informatics Pty. Ltd. > <http://www.oceaninformatics.biz/>Adjunct Professor, Health > Informatics, Central Queensland University > Senior Visiting Research Fellow, CHIME, University College London > Chair, Standards Australia, EHR Working Group (IT14-9-2) > Ph: +61 (0)4 1783 8808 > Fx: +61 (0)8 8948 0215 > > > - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a > message to d.lloyd at openehr.org e-mail: jamaldo at upvnet.upv.es http://bet.upv.es -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051021/35369352/attachment.html>
