Hi Alberto, Jose Alberto Maldonado wrote:
> Hi, > > Just a doubt. > > Why the classes names are not included in the XML-Schema?. For > instance, it would convenient for multi-valued attributes in order to > distinguish one data instance from another (imagine the potential mess > if the attribute is not ordered). It will also make it "more > compatible" with paths of the form class\attribute\class\attribute of > archetypes. Beside, much typing information is lost, this makes the > XML document less self-descriptive. to be more precise, I suspect you are asking why the class names are not in the data - they are in the schema. I think it would be better. But can you provide specific comments to show why the paths won't match the archetype paths (which is what we want - so if it doesn't work, we will change the schema). - thomas - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
