Rodrigo Filgueira wrote: > Resending, because of problems with the list. > > Should C_DOMAIN_TYPE classes be defined based (using) on C_PRIMITIVE? > I believe a common interface (C_DATA_TYPE) should be extract from these two classes as I pointed in my previous post.
Rong > and more, > > are any of the C_PRIMITIVE classes used directly as a constraint to an > archetype element? > > these questions refer to the fact that string or integers by themselves > do not have any semantic meaning, they acquire meaning inside DATA_VALUE > instances, do they not? > > So as we advance in using and understanding AM we find that more classes > may be needed in the PROFILE package in order to validate DATA_VALUES. > > just thoughts, and doubts, we are trying to understand the model, and > how it is used. > If you could tell us how you use it, I believe it would be very helpful. > thank you > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Rodrigo Filgueira > Asistente Docente/Investigador > N?cleo de Ingenier?a Biom?dica, FING - UDELAR > >
