In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa (standaardtijd), schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
> Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but for > proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this will mean that these kind of > archetypes can only be distributed to people that have paid the license. Sorry, but Snomed CT cannot be considered a proprietary terminology given the formal international SDO status from January onward. Further, most English speaking countries (Cnd, UK, US, Aus, Nw Zealand) already have a national licence allowing everyone to use it for health purposes. William Goossen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061219/1f837976/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
