Williamtfgoossen at cs.com schreef: > In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa > (standaardtijd), schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com: > > >> Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but >> for proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this will mean that these >> kind of archetypes can only be distributed to people that have paid >> the license. > > > Sorry, but Snomed CT cannot be considered a proprietary terminology > given the formal international SDO status from January onward. > > Further, most English speaking countries (Cnd, UK, US, Aus, Nw > Zealand) already have a national licence allowing everyone to use it > for health purposes. You mean, for free? Paid by the resp. governments?
That, I did not know. Bert _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
