Tim Cook wrote: >On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 23:07 +0200, Bert Verhees wrote: > > >>Please correct me if I am wrong, >> >>Please take it as a request for information, or if I am wrong and need >>to be corrected, as a discussion. >> >> > >If you go here: >http://svn.openehr.org/specification/BRANCHES/Release-1.0-candidate/publishing/index.html > >and scroll down a bit you will notice that the kind folks at ACODE have >contributed a Java ITS. > >HTH, > > Yes, I have seen that, Tim, thanks for pointing me to it. It is very good done, I believe Acode understands very well the needs of an opensource project, but, at this moment, for me, it is not yet much to start working with. Implementing an OpenEhr-solution would still cost multiple man-years.
I guess, many things I will write below, I already said in other emails, maybe in slightly different context. I apologise for repeating myself!!!! I hope this is the last time I will broe this public with my repeating questions and statements and (sometimes wild) geussing And I do not want to blame somebody for something, but as I see, there are very impressive projects in the deploymentsector on the website. They must have used databases, other programming languages, UML created, component-interfaces, plans about how to follow the OpenEhr-developments. F.e. it does not seem effici?nt to me to rewrite the codebase in C#, java, whatever, by hand when the OpenEhr defintions changes signicantly. It would be very nice if those people would share what they know, and discovered. I am not asking them to publish their commercial-product code. I guess, we must regard toEiffel in OpenEhr-context as a case-tool, not as a programming-environment, because both serve another purpose, and one must be able to distinguish the two. So if the Eiffelcode must be regarded as a product of a case-tool. I must say, I like XMI better. I understand, Thomas likes working with Eiffel, many people have their tools, Thomas has Eiffel. We need a bridge between Thomas his favorite tool and more common case tools, so code can be generated for many other environments. I have seen magicDraw UML in the SVN=tree, but is it always updated as the Eiffel-code is? Can it safely be used to generate code? Is it complete enough do do a signifant part of the code-generation? Many questions, I would be really pleased if I would find answers, which make the fantastic concept, which OpenEhr is, useable for me. I think I have to wait another year before I can really use it. Kind regards Bert Verhees
