Hugh Grady wrote: >Hi Tom > >I prefer the original structure, mainly from a general dislike of aggregate >attributes (such as the new one combining the terminology and the code id). > > In general I agree with the sentiment; I would only say that coded terms are somewhat of an exception - or any identifier with a name-space prepended, which is essentially what this is.
>I can see the need to decompose the attribute to talk to the right >terminology being a nuisance and it could make some sensible operations >difficult when dealing with CODE_PHRASEs from multiple terminologies. > > Can you elaborate on the last point above, Hugh? - thomas
