Hi,
Dear Andrew, On 3-jan-2007, at 14:40, Andrew Patterson wrote: > >> Just thinking long term, just say some archetype was defined for >> some little used data entry. The archetype (which includes a URL >> term binding) is put into the clinical system. Some data matching >> the archetype is entered - the system checks that the terminology >> codes >> for allowed data match those returned in the URL and all is good. 10 >> years down the >> track, someone goes to do the same thing. Given Australian government >> departments barely keep their names for more than a few years, >> what are >> the chances the URL is still working? If it is a local reference, >> what are the >> chances the machines still have the same IP addresses or names? >> Can the clinical system still rely on the term codes it cached 10 >> years >> ago? All this is precisely the reason for EuroRec (the European Institute for Health Records) to develop: - an Archetype Repository - an Archetype Inventory - plus a Quality Control Service. We do this in an European project: Q-Rec. Francois Mennerat is leading this task. We could perform this task for others as well. With regards, Gerard Freriks -- <private> -- Gerard Freriks, MD Huigsloterdijk 378 2158 LR Buitenkaag The Netherlands T: +31 252544896 M: +31 620347088 E: gfrer at luna.nl Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070103/611369ea/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
