Bert Verhees wrote: > > In so far, not because I like to disagree, but regrettable, many of the > function/method-bodies in the Eiffel-code are empty. Eiffel seems merely > to be/have been used as a kind of case-tool instead of really building > a openehr kernel-implementation. > Which is a good use for Eiffel, but it is something else then writing an > implementation
I don't know what you're referring to, Bert. The Eiffel code has most definitely been written as an implementation. We are using it. ADL Workbench is built entirely in Eiffel. The Ocean Archetype Editor, which is written in VB.NET, uses the Eiffel kernel classes in the form of a .NET assembly. Maybe you've been looking at the Eiffel code via EiffelStudio's "contract" or "interface" views: these views hide the implementation of the classes. - Peter
