Peter Gummer wrote: > Adam Flinton wrote: > > >> I have already noted how using text children of an element to use a value >> vs a std "value" attribute in the archetype xml inflates the file sizes. >> > > > So you aren't convinced by Thomas's objection that putting the values in XML > attributes would make a mess of the XPath? >
No as the existing paths aren't xpaths at all e.g.. <Rule path="/items[at0001]/items[at0004]" max="0" /> let alone something like <excludedValues>local::at0013</excludedValues> It's simply a matter of parsing the file into an AOM. Adam > - Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > ********************************************************************** This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million messages are sent every day by the system. To find out why more and more NHS personnel are switching to this NHS Connecting for Health system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail **********************************************************************
