Sam Heard wrote:
> Hi All
>
> One senses the different backgrounds of the players here - the more 
> operational the focus the more useful XML is but in the design and 
> modelling world it is of no use at all. I think almost everyone is 
> delighted with what can be done with XML these days - the more it is 
> used the more that is possible on the web. But ASCII was the same when 
> it came out and really OWL as RDF is not very easy to deal with even 
> with all the wonderful tools (because you have to have the model right).
>
> I have been working with Tom long enough to understand the issue when 
> you are formally describing the set of possible constraints that might 
> be necessary in any given model. The UML and XML serialisation come 
> later in this process.
>
> So we all need to accept that value of both approaches - if we are 
> serialising something formal that does the job and can reload and use 
> it then that is fine. I am pushing for the move to documentation via 
> XML archetypes and XSLT because I believe that the power of that 
> approach and its cross platform utility leaves everything else for 
> dead. But, I recognise that it is not suitable for use at design time 
> although it can serialise the UML (sometimes)
>
> You said you have an XSLT for the archetypes - would you like to share 
> it with the community. I think we might see things move quite quickly 
> if we get this out there.
>
> Cheers Sam
>
I would love to.

I will have to get clearance from Ravi, Richard & John but then 
yup...the sooner the better AFAICS.

Adam


>
>
> Adam Flinton wrote:
>>   
>>> Other limitations on using XML - it's a no-show for enterprise scale 
>>> databases 
>>> or information processing. All that wasted space starts to count when you 
>>> have 
>>> to buy two ?20,000 high availability RAID disk arrays instead of one....and 
>>> plus 
>>> the bandwidth wastage when there are millions of messages rather than just 
>>> a 
>>> few. Yes, binary compression helps, but it just shifts disk and bandwidth 
>>> loss 
>>> to the CPU. There are many better ways to represent data for large-scale 
>>> deployments than XML (even the dADL syntax from ADL does 100% better in 
>>> space, 
>>> and represents all object-oriented constructs unambiguously).
>>>   
>>>     
>> You have got to be kidding me on this one.
>>
>> Having done XML messaging in very large retail systems (major
>> supermarket chains in the EU & US), mobile phone systems, home
>> office/criminal justice system & now the CFH....you simply have got to
>> be kidding.
>>
>> ummmmmm.......where to even start....oh yes how about...
>>
>> "XML is a very commonly used standard with thousands of tools in
>> existence from routing engines, to processing engines to parsers to
>> database layers ...."
>>
>> or maybe
>>
>> "XML is THE standard in enterprise level messaging systems with
>> standards such as SOAP, EbXML, OAGI BODS etc.etc."
>>
>> or maybe :
>>
>> "XML integrates easily with existing web infrastructures by use of such
>> mechanisms as AJAX, Rest JSON etc".
>>
>>
>> Now wrt ADL.....
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>> This message  may  contain  confidential  and  privileged information.
>> If you are not  the intended  recipient please  accept our  apologies.
>> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute  information in this e-mail
>> or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so is strictly
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
>> gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your co-operation.
>>
>> NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
>> messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
>> more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
>> system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>
>>
>>   
>
> -- 
>       Dr Sam Heard
> Chief Executive Officer
> Ocean Informatics
>
> Director, openEHR Foundation
> Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London
> Aus: +61 4 1783 8808
> UK: +44 77 9871 0980
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>   


**********************************************************************
This message  may  contain  confidential  and  privileged information.
If you are not  the intended  recipient please  accept our  apologies.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute  information in this e-mail
or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your co-operation.

NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
**********************************************************************


Reply via email to