Really i see that 'duplicated' section like the codified entry in CDA, that is the machine readable information and the section like the narrative section in CDA (the human readable information), in few words i like this approach, and made the openEHR archetypes more compatibles with CDA Docs, i think so. This discussion where a topic between me and Diego Kaminker (Chair man HL7 Argentina Foundation) this weekend in a CDA Course in Cali-Colombia, and the conclusion of that discussion where that archetypes could be more flexible whit approachs like Sam's
-- ->No hay absolutamente nadie que haga un sacrificio sin esperar compensaci?n. Todo es cuesti?n de mercado. -- Juan G. Bernal Estudiante - Ingenieria de Sistemas - Univalle +57 2 513 03 88 Cel: 310 503 1804 juangber at univalle.edu.co juancho2986 at gmail.com Cali - Colombia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080820/e9a73cab/attachment.html>
