Hi Grahame,
You are right that the compositional grammar don?t solve the whole problem.
I just meant that the compositional grammar probably is a part of the
solution for binging to SNOMED CT (and maybe other systems that is possible
to postcoordinate.)
Greetings,
Mikael
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Grahame Grieve
Sent: den 2 december 2008 23:23
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: text and description
Hi Mikael
I've not seen the final specification, but in it's original
draft, it was extremely limited in scope. For instance, the
language would have made the grammar unsuitable for use in
OpenEHR, though there was no technical reason for this.
Apparently there's going to be a new draft shortly.
However even in it's revised form, the document will almost
certainly only specify a syntax for building single concepts.
It will not provide a syntax or a grammar that deals with
conformance and binding, though one of these is surely needed.
Grahame
Mikael Nystr?m wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some days after 2008-12-09 IHTSDO probably release a draft of a
> compositional grammar for SNOMED CT expressions which can be used for
> terminology bindings to SNOMED CT. This draft can probably be a basis for
> discussions of terminology bindings.
>
> Greetings,
> Mikael
