Ian McNicoll wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > According to Support_IM 5.3.2 > > "Valid identifiers that can be used for this attribute for > terminologies include but are not limited to the > following: > ? "openehr" > ? "centc251" > ? an identifier value from the first column of the US National Library > or Medicine (NLM) > UMLS terminology identifiers table below, in either of two forms: > - as is, e.g. "ICD10AM_2000", "ICPC93"; > - with any trailing section starting with an underscore removed, e.g. > "ICD10AM"." > > So, as far as I can see it should be possible to use a local > identifier, although not supported by the editors at present, the > issue being how to namespace the terminology uniquely. > > I could not see anything in other documentation > For Olof's project I am proposing to use e.g. > > "se.chalmers.MUKOS::mukos-reaktion"
Ian, only problem - that identifier would not be allowed in the (imminent) Release 1.0.2 of openEHR (see http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/BRANCHES/Release-1.0.2-candidate/publishing/roadmap.html) 4.3.12.1 Identifier Syntax The syntax of the value attribute is as follows: # -------- production rules -------- terminology_id: name [ ?(? version ?)? ] name: V_NAME version: V_VERSION # -------- lexical patterns -------- V_NAME: [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-/+]+ V_VERSION: [a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-/.]+ * *
