for those interested, here is a link to the website of the program Thomas said http://www.linkehr.com
2008/2/21, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>: > Oxford Partnership wrote: > > Erik > > > > Many thanks for the quick reply. > > > > I have no issues with the two level models used in OpenEHR, it makes > > perfect sense to me to have an underlying RM for all archetypes to be > > based on. > > > > If I am understand you correctly, then : > > > > - No attributes within an OpenEHR class can be assumed to be > > mandatory within the XML representations, as in all cases the RM can > > be defaulted to. > > as Erik says, if the archetype says nothing, then whatever the RM model > (i.e. the particular classes in question) says goes. > > > - The fact that the current tools do not expose or use these > > attributes, is a design decision made by the people writing the tools. > > well, in hindsight, it was a bad idea - just that the initial builders > knew the models very well but underestimated the importance of making > the RM visible in these tools. Now we know better, but effort is needed > to add this facility to the tools. There is a tool made by the group at > Valencia Polytech in Spain that does this aspect quite well actually, > but doesn't do many of teh editing tasks yet. So - no tool available > today does all that is needed. > > > - thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > -- Diego Bosc? Tom?s <diebosto at fis.upv.es> <yampeku at gmail.com> Grupo IBIME Instituto ITACA - Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia Acceso B Edificio 8G Camino Vera s/n 46022 VALENCIA (Spain) tel: +34 963 875 277 http://ibime.upv.es
