Bert Verhees schreef:
> Thilo Schuler schreef:
>> For openEHR I will concentrate on the GUI part. Had to investigate it
>> for a uni project.
>>
>> Just wanted to let everybody know about IBM DB2 9.5, which I think is
>> a fair, "uncrippled" offer.
> 
> oh
Sorry, Clicked accidently on Send

I hope someone will pick up this subject, I would be glad to help

So, if someone considers, DB2, or any other DB, that shoudln't matter,
there are many free DB-engines, it should not be visible in the API.

Bert

> 
>> On Jan 2, 2008 5:18 PM, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl> wrote:
>>> Thilo Schuler schreef:
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> just a short note:
>>>>
>>>> I am more a  front-end person (plan to start a OSS GUI project in
>>>> 2008), although I have an vested interested in a open persistence
>>>> solution, since I would like to see an end-to-end system demonstrator
>>>> based on OSS components (GUI, kernel, persistence). IMO (and in Rong's
>>>> etc) this would really boost openEHR.
>>>>
>>>> I believe a generic persistence layer API(s) - as Tom said - is the
>>>> way to go. This won't happen in one go. So in a truely agile
>>>> development style this has to happen over several iterations, while
>>>> every iteration product has to be usable!
>>>>
>>>> The reason for this post is that I recently investigated the IBM DB2 9
>>>> DBMS . This could be a good starting point or reference to build the
>>>> API layer on.
>>>>
>>> If you need any help?
>>>
>>> Bert
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
> 
> 


Reply via email to