Bert Verhees wrote: > > People discuss very seriuous all kind of subjects, very deeply, that is > OK, but why do they never discuss a solution to a Persistence-layer-API? > (not the layer itself, only the API.) > Another thing that is never discussed, that is the service-layer-API, > same question, not the service-laer itself is needed to discuss, only > the API. > > Why is that? > > I never found an answer to these questions, so I can only guess. Or > maybe I missed them, I do not read all emails. Possible. Please tell me, > don't stay quiet, but tell me what is happening, not only me, but I > think many silent people would want to know. > > Bert > > > the main reason is that a persistence layer API is not an essential part of openEHR - anyone can make up their own, and it makes no difference to the semantics of openEHR. It is only really useful if there is going to be a market in archetype-driven databases, which is not happening just yet....
- thomas * *
