Andrew Patterson wrote: > Sam, without putting words in Adams mouth, I think he was asking about > the precedence of include/exclude sections. It is a common problem is > coming up with rule system like this - for instance one can look at the > allow/deny pattern of the apache2.conf file for how to setup IP address > ranges. In the apache case, there is an explicit clause that allows the > order to be changed - either allow first then deny, or deny first then allow. > > In the ADL spec, this is mentioned as a "yet to be defined" (section 5.3.8). > Indeed. I don't think the requirements have been adequately defined, so this remains one of the few little holes to plug properly in ADL.
- thomas
